13–15 minute read
Introduction
We live in a world that
worships outcomes. A man is celebrated because his business is booming. A woman
is admired because her marriage looks perfect on social media. A preacher is
honoured because his church is filling up and his ministry is producing miracles
that trend online. Slowly, without many of us noticing, the church has absorbed
this same measuring stick. We have started to ask, does this person have
results? Is this ministry growing? Are signs and wonders following? And when
the answer is yes, we conclude that the person must be right with God.
This is a call to pause
and examine that assumption in the light of scripture. Results, however
impressive, do not validate a person. They never have and they never will.
The
world's standard is not God's standard
Romans 12:2 tells us
plainly, “And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the
renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and
perfect, will of God.” The word conform means to be pressed into a mould. The world
has a mould, and that mould says results equal righteousness. If it works, it
must be right. If it grows, it must be blessed. If it heals, it must be of God.
But Paul does not tell us
to conform. He tells us to be transformed, and that transformation begins in
the mind. A renewed mind does not evaluate spiritual matters the way the world
evaluates business or entertainment. A renewed mind asks a different question
altogether. Not does it work, but is it obedient. Not does it produce, but is
it true.
What
Jesus said about results
There is no clearer
passage on this subject than Matthew 7:21 to 23. Jesus said, “Not every one
that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he
that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that
day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast
out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess
unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.”
Read that carefully. These
were not people with empty hands. They prophesied. They cast out demons. They
performed wonderful works, which in the original language includes miracles of
power. By every worldly and even every modern ministry standard, these people
were successful. They had results that many pulpits today would call proof of
divine backing. Yet Jesus did not say well done. He said, I never knew you.
This is the most sobering
warning in the New Testament concerning ministry. It teaches us that a person
can operate in genuine spiritual power and still be unknown by Christ, because
power and results are not the same thing as relationship and obedience. What
Jesus was looking for was not what they did in his name, but whether they did
the will of the Father. Doing versus knowing. Activity versus intimacy. Results
versus relationship.
God
does not change, and neither do his principles
Malachi 3:6 says, “For I
am the LORD, I change not.” Hebrews 13:8 adds, “Jesus Christ the same
yesterday, and to day, and for ever.” And James 1:17 describes God as the
Father of lights, “with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning.”
These are not decorative
verses. They carry weight for the subject at hand. If God does not change, then
his standard for validating a person has not changed either. He was never a God
who measured a man by his harvest alone. In the Old Testament, King Saul had
victories and results, yet God rejected him because of disobedience. In 1
Samuel 15:22, Samuel told him, “Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and
to hearken than the fat of rams.” Saul's disobedience was hidden behind a
battlefield success, but God was not fooled by the results. He looked at the
heart and the obedience behind the results.
If that was true then, it
is true now, because God has not changed his mind about what matters to him.
Why
the old path still matters
Jeremiah 6:16 says, “Thus
saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where
is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls.” This
verse was a call to a nation that had drifted from the ways of God in pursuit
of what seemed convenient and current. God's instruction was simple. Go back
and ask for the old path. Not the new path. Not the trending path. The old,
tested path.
There is wisdom in the
popular saying, if it is not broken, do not fix it. The principles of scripture
were never broken. Faith, obedience, holiness, the fear of God, love, humility,
these have never failed to produce a life pleasing to God. What has changed is
the world's tolerance for these things. The world now calls holiness rigid and
grace permissive. It calls conviction judgemental and compromise loving. And
because the church wants to remain relevant to a changing culture, many have
quietly adjusted the message to fit the moment rather than adjusting the moment
to fit the message.
But scripture was never
given to be edited by culture. Culture was meant to be transformed by
scripture.
Drawing
all men does not mean drawing the world's ways in
John 12:32 records Jesus
saying, “And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me.”
This verse is often used to justify a softened gospel, one that adapts its
standards so that more people feel comfortable. But look closely at what the
verse says. It says Christ will draw all men to himself when he is lifted up.
It does not say the church will lower its standards to draw the world in. The
drawing power belongs to a lifted up Christ, not to a diluted message.
There is a critical
difference between reaching people where they are and leaving them where they
are. The gospel reaches sinners without becoming sinful. It welcomes the broken
without celebrating the brokenness. When the church begins importing the world's
philosophy of results and relevance as the measure of spiritual authenticity,
it is no longer drawing the world to Christ. It is drawing the world's system
into Christ's house.
Galatians 6:7 warns us
plainly, “Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that
shall he also reap.” Sowing to the flesh, even under a spiritual banner, will
still reap corruption. Sowing to the Spirit reaps life, regardless of how the
results look in the short term.
Gifts
are not the same as character
Modern ministry culture
often treats visible results, growing numbers, healings, financial
breakthroughs, as the badge of spiritual qualification. If a man's ministry is
producing results, he is quickly considered fit to lead, mentor, or be followed
without question. But scripture separates gifting from godliness.
1 Corinthians 13:1 to 3
makes this distinction unmistakably clear. Paul says a man can speak in the
tongues of men and angels, have the gift of prophecy, understand all mysteries
and all knowledge, have faith to move mountains, and give all he owns to the
poor, and yet without love, he is nothing. Nothing. Not diminished, not lesser,
nothing. Gifting without character is described by Paul as sounding brass and a
tinkling cymbal, noise without substance.
Galatians 5:22 and 23 then
gives us the true measure God is looking for, the fruit of the Spirit, which is
love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, and
temperance. Notice this list has nothing to do with numbers, growth, or visible
achievement. It has everything to do with the inward transformation of a life.
Fruit, not results, is the biblical evidence of a life connected to God.
The
real danger
The danger of measuring
spiritual standing by results is that it can quietly excuse compromise. A
leader who is producing results, growing a following, seeing miracles, becomes
difficult to correct, because the results are treated as proof that God is with
him regardless of his conduct. This is exactly the trap the people in Matthew 7
fell into. They pointed to their results as evidence, as if to say, surely if
we were wrong, none of this would be happening. Yet Christ still said, I never
knew you.
This is why scripture
repeatedly calls believers to test everything, not by outcomes, but by the
word. 1 John 4:1 instructs us to “try the spirits whether they are of God.”
Acts 17:11 commends the Bereans for searching the scriptures daily to see
whether what they were told was true. Not whether it produced results. Whether
it agreed with the word.
The
other side of the same error
There is a quieter danger
that grows out of this same soil, and it deserves to be named plainly. A church
culture that honours men because they have results will, almost without
noticing, begin to look down on men who seem not to have any. The preacher whose
church is small is assumed to be less anointed. The believer whose business has
not prospered is assumed to be lacking in faith. The faithful member who serves
for years without applause is quietly overlooked, while the one with a
following is ushered to the front. We do not usually say this out loud. We
simply act it out in who gets platformed, who gets consulted, who gets
believed, and who gets politely tolerated.
But scripture never made
worldly visibility the measure of a man's worth before God. When Samuel came to
anoint a king from among Jesse's sons, he was drawn to Eliab's appearance, yet
the LORD told him, “Look not on his countenance, or on the height of his
stature... for the LORD seeth not as man seeth; for man looketh on the outward
appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart” (1 Samuel 16:7). David, the one
eventually chosen, was not even called in from the field at first. He was the
one nobody thought to consider.
Paul says something
similar of the church itself. “For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not
many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called: but
God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God
hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are
mighty” (1 Corinthians 1:26 to 27). If God himself regularly chooses the
overlooked, a church that reflexively honours only the visible and successful
is applying a standard God does not use, and quietly dishonouring people God
has not dishonoured.
James addresses this
directly as a sin, not a preference. He describes a congregation that gives the
best seat to the man with fine clothing and a gold ring, and tells the poor man
to stand or sit on the floor, and calls this “respect of persons,” adding, “Are
ye not then partial in yourselves, and are become judges of evil thoughts?”
(James 2:1 to 4). Honouring results while looking down on the absence of
results is the same partiality in modern dress. It judges by what is visible,
which is precisely what James condemns.
This matters because
obedience without results is not failure. A man can be entirely faithful,
prayerful, holy, and obedient, and still labour in a field that never grows
large, a ministry that never trends, a business that never booms. Zechariah 4:6
reminds us that true fruitfulness is “not by might, nor by power, but by my
spirit, saith the LORD.” The size of the outcome was never fully in the
labourer's hands to begin with, which means it was never a fair measure of the
labourer's faithfulness either. To honour results and quietly disdain their
absence is to reward what God never promised to distribute evenly, while
dishonouring the very obedience he actually asks for.
When
liberty should yield to love
If results cannot validate
a person before God, neither can the argument that it is not explicitly
forbidden. The church has increasingly leaned on this defence to justify
practices around dressing, hair covering, tattoos, men braiding their hair,
women piercing their noses, men wearing earrings, the reasoning being, since
scripture does not name the item specifically, it must be permitted. But this
is the same conformity Romans 12:2 warns against, only wearing a different
disguise. It has simply moved from does it work to is it technically not
forbidden, and called that righteousness.
Paul anticipated this
exact reasoning and answered it directly. 1 Corinthians 10:23 says, “All things
are lawful for me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for
me, but all things edify not.” Lawful is not the same as edifying. A believer
can ask, is this a sin, and receive a technically honest no, while still being
far from the question that actually matters, does this build up my witness, my
walk, my brother's faith. Paul was not interested in the minimum boundary of
what he could get away with. He was interested in what served Christ and served
others.
This is why 1
Thessalonians 5:22 instructs believers to “abstain from all appearance of
evil.” Not just evil itself, but its appearance. This is a higher standard than
most are willing to accept today, because it asks something scripture rarely
gets credit for asking, that we govern ourselves not only by what is
technically permissible but by what could be mistaken for compromise. If a
practice sits close enough to the world's fashions, its trends, its symbols,
that an observer cannot tell the believer apart from the culture being
resisted, the appearance itself becomes a stumbling block, regardless of the
heart behind it.
Paul modelled this
personally in the matter of food offered to idols, a subject far more debated
in the early church than dress or grooming are today. In 1 Corinthians 8:13 he
says, “Wherefore, if meat make my brother to offend, I will eat no flesh while
the world standeth, lest I make my brother to offend.” Notice Paul does not
argue that the meat itself was sinful. In many cases it was not. His
willingness to give it up entirely was not a legal requirement, it was love
outworking itself as a denial of self. He surrendered a lawful liberty rather
than risk a brother's soul. If Paul held food, one of the most basic and
defensible liberties, that loosely, it is difficult to argue that fashion,
hairstyle, or jewellery should be held any tighter.
This same spirit is echoed
in the instruction to modesty and simplicity given to believers regarding
appearance. 1 Timothy 2:9 speaks of adorning in modest apparel, and 1 Peter 3:3
to 4 points believers away from outward adorning toward the hidden man of the
heart. These verses were never given as a fashion rulebook. They were given to
redirect attention. A life increasingly decorated to draw the eye outward is,
at minimum, worth examining against a faith that is supposed to be increasingly
directed inward and upward.
None of this is to claim
that every believer who dresses fashionably, covers a tattoo, wears an earring,
or has braided hair has sinned in the technical, damnable sense. That is not
the argument scripture is making, and it is not the argument being made here.
The argument is narrower and, in some ways, more searching. If something sits
on the border, if it can be reasonably associated with rebellion, vanity,
worldliness, or confusion of the distinctions God has made between the sexes,
and scripture leaves room for debate about whether it is sin outright, why
would love not settle the matter anyway? Why contend for the right to keep
something that offers no spiritual gain, when giving it up costs nothing but
preference, and keeping it risks confusing a watching world about what the
church actually stands for?
This is the old path
Jeremiah 6:16 speaks of. It is not a call to legalism, which adds rules
scripture never gave. It is a call to relinquish liberties scripture never
required us to hold onto in the first place, for the sake of a clearer witness.
A church that fights to keep every borderline liberty while calling itself set
apart has misunderstood what set apart means. Holiness has never been about how
close to the world's line a believer can stand without technically crossing it.
It has been about how far from that line love is willing to walk, for the sake
of not causing a brother, or a watching world, to stumble.
Conclusion
Results can be a byproduct
of obedience, but results are never the proof of it. A person's standing with
God is not measured by how big their platform is, how many are healed under
their hands, or how quickly their ministry grows. It is measured by whether
they know him, and whether they are doing the will of the Father, which begins
with a transformed mind, not a conformed one.
The call before every
believer today is the call Jeremiah gave a wandering nation. Stand in the ways.
Ask for the old paths. Walk in what has always been good, and find rest for
your soul. God has not changed. His principles have not changed. And no amount
of results, however impressive to the world's eyes, will ever be a substitute
for a life that truly knows him and truly obeys him.

No comments:
Post a Comment